The anti-Israel-bias-circus in full swing in “Israel threatening to quit UN probe into flotilla.”
Israel threatened – Later we see that it’s a reaction to what the UN said.
a deadly raid – It was an interception and the deadliness was self-defense.
on a Turkish flotilla – Just on ONE boat there was trouble.
heading for Gaza – FINALLY NOT claiming it was braking a blockade.
the May 31 raid – You always use the word at least twice in every report.
nine pro-Palestinian activists – Terrorists.
were killed – In self-defense.
aiming to break Israel’s blockade on Gaza – But this is not true; aiming for trouble.
Israeli prime minister’s Office issued a harsh statement – Harsh?
its policy of boycotting U.N. probes – As if they are recalcitrant.
Israel has considered the world body and its committees biased – Considered? Not true?
the world outcry against the deadly raid – (third time “raid”!) – For the 19th time AP refuses to mention that the G-8 backed up Israel on the interception completely.
Israel’s strict three-year – Why strict, Why not fitting? Four years, by the way.
Israel’s blockade on Gaza – Together with Egypt and for self-defense.
Israel little choice but to cooperate – Israel can only be forced to be reasonable?
Fifteen points of bias in such a short report, many of them repeat offenses. Boo.
After all this bias, the last three paragraphs are fine.